It seems like every few months there is a news item about a guy who takes up arms and kills as many people as he is able before being put down. Sometimes there are targets in mind, others the deaths are quite random. It’s sad news, but I doubt anyone who reads this is unaware.
Whenever the killers have a religious background, especially when it factors into the killer’s motivations, many atheists are sure to place part of the blame on the religion itself. I do too, but less directly than most.
The killers are mentally ill. We can argue that they aren’t all mentally ill, but it can’t be argued that this pool of killers are not, on average, more mentally ill than the general population. Their brain chemistry is rare and so puts their behavior at odds with cultural and societal norms. Their indoctrination didn’t do this to their brain chemistry. However, their indoctrination and the beliefs of those closest to them inform what they do about their problem.
There is a large stigma regarding mental illness in the United States which leads families and individuals to deny symptoms and shy away from treatment. Most religions don’t have a hard line against medical treatments, my ex-denomination excluded, they do put a lot of faith in spiritual sovereignty. If a benevolent God created us equal with freedom of will and thought, then a select few of us can’t be naturally deficient in will or thought. The mind, spirit or soul can’t be subject to variations of brain chemicals if any transcend the material world.
Mental illness should be at the forefront of our thoughts when these tragedies happen, but for the most part it’s not. I didn't want to post this immediately after such an event, I would feel like I'm capitalizing on a horrible thing, but it will happen again and we should do what we can to change this stigma and get these people help.
I have no affiliation to the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, but believe they do good work in the field. If you have some time, look it over. If you have some money, donate.
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Takes on Recent News Items
Thinking can undermine religious faith, study finds
Active, analytical thinking leads to less religious belief than passive, intuitive thinking. Makes perfect sense to me. The more interesting bit is how the test subjects showed different levels of faith after being primed for analytical thought.
It occurs to me that the difference in analytical and intuitive thinking also helps explain my view of morality. We can rationalize the best ethical decision in any given situation while, in the more black and white moral choices, we intuitively know right from wrong. This isn't due to some divinely inspired conscious, it's simply instinct.
From Minister To Atheist: A Story Of Losing Faith
Wow, what an awful position to be in. I wonder if many ministers lose their faith and keep preaching. If I was faced with losing my job, family and friends I might put up with a little hypocrisy--trying to convince myself that I could be wrong in my atheism. I doubt I could keep it up, and no one should. If you can't be true to yourself, who can you be true for?
This story shows the importance of an active atheist community. Mrs. MacBain knew she was not alone and the positive feedback of that conference surely dulled the pain of coming out.
Highly religious people are less motivated by compassion than are non-believers
Catholic church goers give money to charities (and the church) during collections every Sunday. The priest asks them to give and they give. This is admirable and the source of a ton of charitable funds, but the generosity is not triggered by compassion. I've asked Catholics immediately after the collection who they just donated to and most of them can't tell me.
People who don't go to church, and don't have a sense of obligation to give, only give out of compassion.
Active, analytical thinking leads to less religious belief than passive, intuitive thinking. Makes perfect sense to me. The more interesting bit is how the test subjects showed different levels of faith after being primed for analytical thought.
It occurs to me that the difference in analytical and intuitive thinking also helps explain my view of morality. We can rationalize the best ethical decision in any given situation while, in the more black and white moral choices, we intuitively know right from wrong. This isn't due to some divinely inspired conscious, it's simply instinct.
From Minister To Atheist: A Story Of Losing Faith
Wow, what an awful position to be in. I wonder if many ministers lose their faith and keep preaching. If I was faced with losing my job, family and friends I might put up with a little hypocrisy--trying to convince myself that I could be wrong in my atheism. I doubt I could keep it up, and no one should. If you can't be true to yourself, who can you be true for?
This story shows the importance of an active atheist community. Mrs. MacBain knew she was not alone and the positive feedback of that conference surely dulled the pain of coming out.
Highly religious people are less motivated by compassion than are non-believers
Catholic church goers give money to charities (and the church) during collections every Sunday. The priest asks them to give and they give. This is admirable and the source of a ton of charitable funds, but the generosity is not triggered by compassion. I've asked Catholics immediately after the collection who they just donated to and most of them can't tell me.
People who don't go to church, and don't have a sense of obligation to give, only give out of compassion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)